Thursday, February 10, 2011

so they treat the water and then want to see if it's safe?

WATER INDUSTRY NEWS


American Water receives $250,000 grant to study distribution system biostability << BACK
Monday, February 07, 2011



VOORHEES, N.J. — The Water Research Foundation has awarded American Water Works Company Inc. a research grant of $250,000 to examine practical indicators of distribution system biostability, according to a press release.

Titled “An Operational Definition of Biostability in Drinking Water,” the study will focus on biodegradable organic matter; disinfectant demand and biodegradation of haloacetic acids; biofilm formation and corrosion rates; and biological consumption of ammonia, nitrate and phosphate.

American Water will directly receive $125,000 to pay for analytical costs, supplies, labor and other research costs, and approximately 20 utilities will provide in-kind contributions of $590,992, the release stated.

“We are pleased that the Water Research Foundation continues to recognize American Water as a leader in industry research,” said Dr. Mark LeChevallier, director of Environmental Stewardship and Innovation. “Our team of expert scientists and engineers, coupled with our large and diverse geographical footprint, provides an exceptional opportunity to study and develop best practices for the water industry.”

To read the entire article, click here.

For related information, click here.


[More In Brief...]
Return to today's news | Discuss this topic with other water and wastewater industry professionals | Sign up for a free subscription to WaterTech e-News Daily™ | Request a free introductory subscription (or subscription renewal) to Water Technology® magazine.

read this well so if the water is bad it's ok to drink as is

WATER INDUSTRY NEWS


Ohio EPA: Reverse osmosis may cause pollution problems << BACK
Monday, February 07, 2011


COLUMBUS, OHIO — According to an ongoing study by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the municipal use of reverse osmosis (RO) to treat drinking water may cause pollution problems in the state’s waterways, The Columbus Dispatch reported.

While RO creates cleaner drinking water, it leaves behind “reject water,” which is filled with minerals and pollutants, according to the story.

This reject water is too volatile to dump into nearby bodies of water, as it will kill or hurt the wildlife, the article stated.

As a result, the city of Delaware, Ohio, would have to spend $2 million dollars to pump the reject water five miles away to a sewer plant, and officials in the town of Marysville said they will have to spend as much as $1 million dollars to inject the waste 3,500 feet underground, the article stated.

“Right now, we are taking another look at the entire process to make sure we are going ahead with the most cost effective process,” said Rick Westerfield, Columbus’ water and power administrator.

To read the entire article, click here.

For related information, click here.

[More In Brief...]
Return to today's news | Discuss this topic with other water and wastewater industry professionals | Sign up for a free subscription to WaterTech e-News Daily™ | Request a free introductory subscription (or subscription renewal) to Water Technology® magazine.



WATERTECH COMMUNITY

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

is this interresting

WATER INDUSTRY NEWS
Study links drinking-water fluoride to low IQ scores in children
<< BACK
Wednesday, December 22, 2010

NEW YORK — Results of a new study recently pre-published in Environmental Health Perspectives suggests that exposure to fluoride may lower children’s intelligence, according to a press release.

In this study, 512 children aged 8-13 years in two Chinese villages were studied and tested — Wamaio with an average of 2.47 mg/L water fluoride and Xinhuai averaging 0.36 mg/L.

About 28 percent of the children in the low-fluoride area scored as bright, normal or higher intelligence compared to only 8 percent in the high-fluoride area of Wamaio, the release stated.

In the high-fluoride city, 15 percent had scores indicating mental retardation and only 6 percent in the low-fluoride city.

“This is the 24th study that has found this association, but this study is stronger than the rest because the authors have controlled for key confounding variables and in addition to correlating lowered IQ with levels of fluoride in the water, the authors found a correlation between lowered IQ and fluoride levels in children’s blood,” said Paul Connett, Ph.D., director of the Fluoride Action Network. “This brings us closer to a cause and effect relationship between fluoride exposure and brain damage in children.”

To read the entire article, click here.

For related information, click here.
[More In Brief...]
Return to today's news | Discuss this topic with other water and wastewater industry professionals | Sign up for a free subscription to WaterTech e-News Daily™ | Request a free introductory subscription (or subscription renewal) to Water Technology® magazine.

this is why you need a ro drinking system

WATER INDUSTRY NEWS
EPA responds to hexavalent chromium in drinking water study
<< BACK
Wednesday, December 22, 2010

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a press release in response to a recent study by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) that found that tap water in 31 of 35 American cities is contaminated with hexavalent chromium.

EPA reiterated that the total chromium standard is currently set at 100 parts per billion (ppb) and that water systems are required to test for it.

The agency confirmed that a review of hexavalent chromium is currently ongoing and that it will consider setting a new standard in 2011, the release stated.

“Ensuring safe drinking water for all Americans is a top priority for EPA,” the agency said in the release. “The agency regularly re-evaluates drinking water standards and, based on new science on chromium-6, had already begun a rigorous and comprehensive review of its health effects. In September, we released a draft of that scientific review for public comment. When this human health assessment is finalized in 2011, EPA will carefully review the conclusions and consider all relevant information, including the Environmental Working Group’s study, to determine if a new standard needs to be set.”

To read the entire article, click here.

For related information, click here.
[More Regulatory Matters]
Return to today's news | Discuss this topic with other water and wastewater industry professionals | Sign up for a free subscription to WaterTech e-News Daily™ | Request a free introductory subscription (or subscription renewal) to Water Technology® magazine.

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

it all about money ?

WATER INDUSTRY NEWS
EPA: 1 billion pounds of water pollution reduced in 2010
<< BACK
Tuesday, December 07, 2010

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced the release of its annual enforcement and compliance results, according to a press release.

In fiscal year (FY) 2010, EPA took enforcement and compliance actions that require polluters to pay more than $110 million in civil penalties and commit to spend an estimated $12 billion on pollution controls, cleanup and environmental projects that benefit communities.

As a result of water cases concluded in FY 2010, EPA is ensuring that an estimated 1 billion pounds of water pollution per year will be reduced, eliminated or properly managed and investments in pollution control and environmental improvement projects from parties worth approximately $8 billion will be made, the release stated.

“At EPA, we are dedicated to aggressively go after pollution problems that make a difference in our communities through vigorous civil and criminal enforcement,” said Cynthia Giles, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. “Our commitment to environmental enforcement is grounded in the knowledge that people not only desire, but expect, the protection of the water they drink, the air they breathe and the communities they call home.”

To read the entire article, click here.

For related information, click here.

[More Environment]
Return to today's news | Discuss this topic with other water and wastewater industry professionals | Sign up for a free subscription to WaterTech e-News Daily™ | Request a free introductory subscription (or subscription renewal) to Water Technology® magazine.

Friday, December 3, 2010

So what do you think this had to hurt

WATER INDUSTRY NEWS
Residential homebuilder fined $925,000 for stormwater violations in 21 states
<< BACK
Friday, December 03, 2010

WASHINGTON — Beazer Homes USA Inc., a national residential homebuilder, has agreed to pay a $925,000 civil penalty to resolve alleged Clean Water Act violations at its construction sites in 21 states, according to a press release.

As part of the settlement, Beazer will also implement a company-wide stormwater program to improve compliance with stormwater runoff requirements at current and future construction sites around the country, the release stated.

“Contaminated stormwater puts children and families at risk as it may carry pollutants, including sediment, debris and pesticides that contribute to water quality problems. These pollutants affect our nation’s rivers, lakes and sources of drinking water,” said Cynthia Giles, assistant administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance and Assurance. “Today’s settlement will help protect public health and the environment by requiring Beazer to meet the requirements of our nation’s environmental laws and improve its oversight of its construction facilities.”

To read the entire article, click here.

For related information, click here.
[More Environment]
Return to today's news | Discuss this topic with other water and wastewater industry professionals | Sign up for a free subscription to WaterTech e-News Daily™ | Request a free introductory subscription (or subscription renewal) to Water Technology® magazine.
WATERTECH COMMUNITY

Thursday, December 2, 2010

S-5-10 senate Bill is crap

Senate Bill 5-10
The Senate passed this week 11-29-10
I don't say much about the government on this blog . And for you that don't know me .I'm a political nut . This bill will tell me how to run MY cows on MY land and tell me what seeds i can plant in MY garden . Tell me how i sell MY produce . When is the Government going to learn to stay out of my life and Govern the country Not the food . This Bill is sponsored by Monsanto. Just another control of my life